The petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal writ petition with a liberty to avail legal remedies if criminal prosecution against her were initiated. The court granted the withdrawal on these terms.
Criminal Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies if criminal prosecution is initiated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.212 OF 2009
Sau. Chandrakala w/o Uttamrao Phad..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr J.M. Murkute, Advocate for the petitioner;
Mr S.K. Kadam, APP for respondent no.1;
Mrs Preeti Diggikar, Advocate for respondents no.2 & 3
CORAM: P.V. HARDAS AND
R.K.DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 11th JUNE, 2009.
PER COURT :
Mr Murkute, learned Counsel for the petitioner states
on instructions that the petitioner may be permitted to
withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the
remedies available to the petitioner in law in the event of
initiation of the criminal prosecution against the
petitioner.
2.Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed
as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. No order as to
costs.
(amj/wp 212.09
2
Sau. Chandrakala w/o Uttamrao Phad.
The State of Mah. & ors.
P.V. Hardas
R.K. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court