This court disposed of a criminal writ petition where the petitioner complained that a suspect impersonating as Bubibai Dnyanoba Gavari was not arrested. The bench held the trial court would invoke powers under Section 319 CrPC during evidence recording.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2035 OF 2009
Tukaram Sadu Pokale .. Petitioner.
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents.
Mr. M.S. Karnik for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh More, APP., for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2009
P.C. :
Heard.
Court with a grievance that the respondents have failed to arrest all the
suspects in the case and particularly one lady who has impersonated as Bubibai Dnyanoba Gavari as accused in the said case as the petitioner is able to identify the said lady.
2
( J. N. PATEL, J.)
( A. A. SAYED, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be required to wait for the trial court to invoke Section 319 CrPC to add an unidentified suspect to the criminal trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tukaram Sadu Pokale
State of Maharashtra
J. N. Patel
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
