Allowed the withdrawal of a criminal application seeking suspension of sentence and dismissed the application. Refused to expedite the hearing of the appeal, directing it to be heard in due course.
Allowed withdrawal of the application seeking suspension of sentence. Application dismissed as withdrawn. Prayer for expediting appeal refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 531 OF 2009
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2005
Ravan s/o Limbaji Lokhande .. Applicant. vs. State of Maharashtra .. Respondent.
Mr. S. P. Munghate for the applicant.
Ms. P.H. Kantharia, APP., for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : J. N. PATEL &
A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 7TH DECEMBER, 2009
P.C. :
After the Court heard the matter for a considerable
time, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant may be permitted to withdraw the application seeking suspension of sentence. Permitted to withdraw. Dismissed as withdrawn.
2
cannot be granted as no exceptional case is made out for giving preference to the case of the appellant over others who are in queue. Appeal to be heard in due course.
( J. N. PATEL, J.)
( A. A. SAYED, J.)
Ravan
State of Maharashtra
J. N. PATEL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
