Clerical error masked as judgment regarding withdrawal of W.P. No.1 of 2001 involving Wadia Ghandy & Co. An erroneous second paragraph discusses octroi recovery against the respondent Corporation.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed; interim relief vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
srk
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE
Writ Petition No.1 of 2001
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and
Registrar's orders
Mr.Sandeep Bhimekar i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for petitioners.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE &. SMT.ROSHAN S. DALVI,JJ.
August 6 2009.
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition, on the basis of instructions he has received. Leave granted and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim relief granted stands vacated. No order as to costs.
The respondent – Corporation is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner no.1 – Company for recovery of octroi charges for
2
the relevant period, unless the same have already been remitted.
(SMT.ROSHAN S.DALVI,J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Wadia Ghandy & Co.
Second Respondent
B.H. Marlapalle
Roshan S. Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
