Allowed
Kalu Vikram Ahire v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCAPPA/958/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.958 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 874 OF 2008
Kalu Vikram Ahire Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. Satyajeet Dighe i/b. Mr. Sagar Kasar , Advocate for the Appellant Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P for the Sate
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED : 6TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C.
(SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 254 days in filing the Criminal Appeal deserves condonation.
Whether the belated Criminal Appeal be allowed under prayer clause (a).
Kalu Vikram Ahire
The State of Maharashtra
B.H. Marlapalle
Roshan Dalvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court