The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, granting liberty to avail alternate remedies. The court reserved liberty regarding limitation issues.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1980 OF 2009
Sow Sarika Naresh Sonwane PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
RESPONDENTS
Mr.N.B.Narwade, Advocate for the petitioners Mr.V.H.Dighe, AGP for respondent State Mr.S.T.Shelke, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 4 Mr.D.R.Markad, Advocate for respondent No.5
[CORAM : P.V.HARDAS, and A.V.POTDAR, J.J.]
DATE : 24th July 2009
PER COURT:
states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this
petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy available to the
petitioner in law. We accordingly dismiss this writ petition as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. We, however, make it clear
that if a question of limitation arises, the authorities shall take
{2}
into consideration the period of pendency of this petition from 23.03.2009 till today. We also expect the authorities to
expeditiously decide the said proceedings, if filed by the petitioner.
[A.V.POTDAR, J.] [P.V.HARDAS, J.]
drp/wp1980-09
Sow Sarika Naresh Sonwane
The State of Maharashtra
P.V.HARDAS
A.V.POTDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
