This application was an interim stay order passed during a letters patent appeal hearing. The high court rejected the stay application, ordering that the liberty is granted to appellants if the appeal remains unheard by September 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3523 OF 2009 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.5 OF 2009
Jitendra S.Munot, Director, M/s Varsha Forging Ltd., Pune and another .. Appellants
Versus
Nareshkumar Gopaldas Vohara and another .. Respondents
Shri T.K.Prabhakaran, Advocate for applicants Shri R.F.Totala, Advocate for respondent No. 2
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ.
DATE : 23rd July 2009
PER COURT :
In the light of the fact that we have set down the letters patent appeal for hearing in the week commencing from 14th September 2009, this stay application is rejected. Liberty to the appellants in the event the appeal is not heard in September 2009.
vvr/3523.09ca
Jitendra S. Munot
Nareshkumar Gopaldas Vohara
P.V. Hardas
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
