Writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such upon the filing of a praecipe by the petitioners' counsel. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1566 OF 2009
Smt. Shamsunnisa A Siddique and others ).. Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others ).. Respondents
None present for the Petitioners. Mr. A.T. Suryavanshi i/b M. Gandhi & Co. for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 15TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C.
In view of the praecipe filed by the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. No order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Shamsunnisa A Siddique
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
