The High Court made the civil application absolute due to the respondents' default and uncontroverted assertions regarding service of notice.
Civil Application made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1263 of 2009
IN RPWST NO. 9412 of 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1477 of 2009
Ramchandra Jagdev Bhujbal & ors. v/s.
Indrajit Subhash Khore & ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Shri Rahul S. Kadam for the petitioner.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
DATED:- September 11, 2009.
P.C.
The Notices sent to the Respondents have been returned with remark ‘refused to accept”. That will have to be treated as good service. Inspite of notice, no appearance is made by the Respondents nor any reply is filed to counter the assertions made in the application. The delay is only of 20 days and for the reasons stated in the application which have remained uncontroverted, application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2
Petitioner to serve the Respondents by Advocate’s notice either personally and/or by speed post/email/fax and file affidavit of service before the returnable date.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J)
Ramchandra Jagdev Bhujbal
Indrajit Subhash Khore
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
