This petition regarding the dilapidated structure of respondent no. 5 was disposed of after the court accepted the lower authority's undertaking to remove it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1877 OF 1998
1.Godrej & Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. & anr....Petitioners.
vs.
1.The Municipal Corporation of Gr.
Bombay & others.
...Respondents.
Mr.H.Toor with M.G.Gawade, for Petitioners.
Ms.Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Mr.R.J.Mane, AGP for Respondent no.4.
Mr.R.C.Dubey i/b. Sanjeev Kadam & Co., for Respondent
no.5
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &
R.G.KETKAR, JJ.
DATED: 24th August,2009.
P.C.:-
1.The learned Counsel appearing for Corporation
states that the structure of the respondent no.5 is in
dilapidated condition and that the respondent no.5 is
2
not doing any business there and that the Corporation
will remove that structure within a period of eight
weeks from today. The statement is accepted. In view
of this statement, no orders are necessary in the
petition. The petition is disposed of. The documents
taken in custody be released to the person from whom
they were taken in custody.
Godrej & Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd.
The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay
D.K.Deshmukh
R.G.Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court