Zenith Limited. v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as it had become infructuous. Rule discharged; no order on costs.
What did the court decide?
Rule discharged; no order on costs.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as it had become infructuous. Rule discharged; no order on costs.
Rule discharged; no order on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1788 OF 1993
Zenith Limited ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Jetly for Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATED : AUGUST 11, 2009
P.C.
None present for the Petitioner. Interim relief was granted on 22.9.1993. On behalf of the Respondents, the learned counsel submits that the Petition has become infructuous. Petition dismissed for non prosecution. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
(D.G. KARNIK,J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
Zenith Limited
Union of India
F.I. REBELLO
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court