The question of law previously framed for reconsideration regarding the Tribunal's finding on estate duty is declared academic consequent to a prior judgment of this court. Accordingly, the question is disposed of without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ESTATE DUTY REFERENCE NO. 3 of 1979
V.G. Badamia .. Applicant
versus
The Controller of Estate Duty Bombay .. Respondent
Mr.Ajit Shah i/b D.Vyas & Mr.S.S.Shetty for the applicant. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the respondent.
CORAM : F. I. REBELLO AND
D.G. KARNIK, JJ DATED : 10th August 2009
P.C:-
2
the finding of the Tribunal upholding the inclusion of the aforesaid sum of Rs,3,36,000/- to the estate of Rs.3,36,000/- to the estate of the deceased passing on his death under section 10 of the Act merited deletion?”
(D.G. KARNIK, J)
(F.I. REBELLO, J)
V.G. Badamia
Controller of Estate Duty Bombay
D.G. Karnik
F.I. Rebello
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
