Summary dismissal of a writ petition. The court refused the petition's reliefs by relying on a Full Bench judgment decided on the same day, finding the petitioner's claims barred by precedent.
Petition summarily dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1785 OF 2009
Rajendra s/o Govindrao Sakalkar..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors...RESPONDENTS
Mr V.A. Bagal, Advocate for the petitioner;
Mr N.N. Jadhav, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3.
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND
A.V. POTDAR, JJ.
DATE : 28th July, 2009
PER COURT :
The reliefs which the petitioner has prayed for
in this petition cannot be granted to the petitioner
in the light of the Full Bench judgment of this Court
in Writ Petition No.5266 of 2008, dated 9th July, 2009.
Petition is accordingly summarily dismissed with no
order as to costs.
[ A.V. POTDAR, J. ] [ P.V.HARDAS, J.]
amj/wp1785.09
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.5266 of 2008Followed¶9
Rajendra s/o Govindrao Sakalkar
The State of Mah. & ors
P.V. HARDAS
A.V. POTDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court