The High Court dismissed the writ petition, stating that it was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel appearing on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2009
Narhari S/o.Bhujangrao Chaudhari
PETITIONER
VERSUS
Zilla Parishad, Parbhani,
and others RESPONDENTS
Mr.S.S.Phatake, h/f.Mr.Sachin Deshmukh, learned counsel for petitioner.
Mr.B.A.Shinde, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and 2
(CORAM : P.V.HARDAS AND
A.V.POTDAR, J.J.)
DATE : 27/07/2009
PER COURT :
(A.V.POTDAR, J.) (P.V.HARDAS, J.)
khs/JULY 2009/wp1353-09
2
Narhari S/o.Bhujangrao Chaudhari
Zilla Parishad, Parbhani
P.V.HARDAS
A.V.POTDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
