The Full Bench Bench at Aurangabad dismissed this writ petition summarily, holding that the relief sought cannot be granted following three 2008 Full Bench judgments to which the current judges were parties. No costs were awarded.
The writ petition was dismissed summarily with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO.1637 OF 2009
Surehdra s/o Shahadeorao Dhage and another
.. Petitiones
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Shri Swapnil S.Patil, Advocate for the petitioners Shri V.B.Ghatge, AGP for respondents 1 to 4
CORAM : P.V. HARDAS AND A.V. POTDAR, JJ.
DATE : 23rd July 2009
PER COURT :
vvr/1637.09wp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the relief sought can be granted in light of Full Bench judgments.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajendra Pandurang PagareApplied¶1
Writ Petition No. 5266 of 2008 (Rajendra Pandurang Pagare and anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Shri Sachin s/o Sahebrao PatilApplied¶1
Writ Petition No. 6100 of 2008 (Shri Sachin s/o Sahebrao Patil and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Shrimant s/o Ankush KambleApplied¶1
Writ Petition No. 7185 of 2008 (Shrimant s/o Ankush Kamble vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Surehdra
Shahadeorao Dhage
The State of Maharashtra
P.V. Hardas
A.V. Potdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
