M/S. Kashiram Jamnadas v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner's counsel was absent on the three occasions the matter was heard in open court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1544/2005
M/s Kashiram Jamnadas Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
Respondent
None for the parties
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 20TH NOVEMBER, 2009.
P.C.:-
This petition was on the board of the Bench presided over by Mr.Justice Rebello on 19/9/2006. The petitioner’s counsel was not present . It was on our board on 8/11/2009 . The petitioner’s counsel was not present. It was again on our board on 19/11/2009. The petitioner’s counsel was not present. Today again the petitioner’s counsel is not present. Hence the petition is dismissed for default.
[SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.]
[MRS.. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.]
M/s Kashiram Jamnadas
Union of India
Ranjana Desai
Mridula Bhartkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court