Notice of motion filed by the first respondent, Security Guards Board, seeking extension of time to complete registration. The court granted three months extension instead of four.
The order grants an extension of three months to complete the registration process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLTE CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 572 OF 2009
IN
Rajesh Vitthal Koyande ... Petitioner Vs. The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane and others ... Respondents
Ms. Ranjana Todankar for the petitioner Dr.(Ms) Pallavi Divekar for respondent-1
CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI AND
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : 20th November, 2009.
P. C.
granted under order dated 25th July, 2009 for completing the process of registration, by further period of four months, or such other period as this court may deem proper.
taken us through the Affidavit of Shri Deepak Raikar, Secretary of the Board. She submits that for the reasons set out therein, time may be
2
extended. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that entire material is available with the Board, hence four months time will be too long a
period. In the circumstances of the case, we extend the time by three months.
Motion is disposed of.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(RANJANA DESAI, J.)
jpc/-
Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane
Rajesh Vitthal Koyande
Ranjana Desai
Mridula Bhattacharji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
