The Court granted leave to the respondent to withdraw a criminal revision application and a condonation application. Consequently, the impugned order was quashed and the writ petition was disposed of.
Leave granted to withdraw applications; impugned order quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1472 OF 2009
Govindu Ramarapu & ors. ... Petitioners versus Vaishali P. Ramarapu & ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Sanjay D. Thokade for the petitioner Mr.Sandeep Salunkhe for respondent no.1. Ms.M.H. Mhatre APP for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J.
DATED : 19th November 2009
P.C.
(D.G. KARNIK,J.)
Govindu Ramarapu & ors.
Vaishali P. Ramarapu & ors.
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
