Ashok Atmaram Deshmukh v. the State Ofmaharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal writ petition disposed of as infructuous since the charge-sheet was filed prior to the filing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
abs
FARAD CONTINUATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1148 OF 2009
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Court's or Judge's Orders
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders
Mr. K.M. Tripathi for the petitioner. Mr. M.K. Kocharekar for respondent no.2. Ms. A.T. Jhaveri, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 18TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C. :
has already been filed on 4th May 2009, the
writ petition has become infructuous. The petition is disposed of as such.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders
State
D.G. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court