A single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition seeking interference, declining to address questions regarding the admissibility of a Will at this interlocutory stage.
The petition was dismissed; the admissibility of the Will was left open for consideration later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1439 OF 2009
Premkumar Bheliram Khera. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Shanta Devendra Nath & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Amogh Paralika for petitioner.
Mr.A.S.Daver a/w. Mr.Sayeed Mulani i/b. M/s.Mulani
& Co. for Respondents.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : FEBRUARY 13, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Heard Counsel for the parties.
2. No interference at this interlocutory stage
is warranted. This Petition is dismissed leaving all
questions regarding admissibility of Will open, to be
considered at the appropriate stage.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with a matter regarding the admissibility of a Will at an interlocutory stage.
Premkumar Bheliram Khera
Shanta Devendra Nath & Ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court