Petitioners sought writ jurisdiction to interfere with the discretionary order passed by the Court below. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition, holding no interference warranted.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1422 OF 2009
Dr.Madhukar Nilmani Goyal & Anr. ...Petitioners
V/s.
Om Gokul Nagari-1 Co-op.
Hsg. Scty. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.S.K.Chaurasia i/b Mr.A.M.Saraogi for Petitioners.
Mr.M.K.Jain for Respondents.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2009.
P.C.
1. Heard Counsel for the parties.
2. No interference with the discretionary
order passed by the Court below is warranted in
exercise of writ jurisdiction. Dismissed.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Dr.Madhukar Nilmani Goyal & Anr.
Om Gokul Nagari-1 Co-op. Hsg. Scty. Ltd. & Ors.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court