Sarwar Hussain Mohamed Ibrahim v. Shaikh Salim Abdul Latif and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1337 OF 2009
Sarwar Hussain Mohamed Ibrahim. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Shaikh Salim Abdul Latif & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.A.S.Khandeparkar i/b. M/s.A.G.Revankar & Co.
for petitioner.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR,J
DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2009.
P.C. :
1. Heard Counsel for the Petitioner.
2. No interference is warranted with the
discretionary order passed by the Court below. It
has rightly found that the Petitioner failed to
establish the factum of due diligence taken by him
due to which he was unable to produce the documents
before the Trial Court. Hence dismissed.
(A.M.KHANWILKAR,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court should interfere with the discretionary order of the trial court dismissing the petition for lack of due diligence to produce documents.
Sarwar Hussain Mohamed Ibrahim
Shaikh Salim Abdul Latif
Anr.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court