In a writ petition concerning a nursing home license, the High Court considered the respondent Corporation's modified statement, leading to the dismissal of the petition with no order as to costs.
Petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.138 OF 2009
Dr. Shailaja Avinash Patwardhan. .. Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri R.V. Samuel for the Petitioners.
Ms Anjali Joshi for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Shri A.C. Singh i/by Shri D.R. Shah for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2009.
P.C.
It is stated on behalf of the Corporation that the application filed by the private Respondent shall be disposed of by
the Corporation expeditiously and in accordance with law.
2
treated as permission for running of the Nursing Home.
as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
`
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J
Dr. Shailaja Avinash Patwardhan
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
