The Bombay High Court, upon the respondent's assurance of discharging its statutory duty, dismissed the writ petition with an observation directing the respondent to pass an appropriate order within six weeks.
The respondent to pass an appropriate order within six weeks after considering the petitioner's representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.137 OF 2009
Venkatesh Karkera Vs.
Mumbai Municipal Commissioner and another
.. Petitioner
.. Respondents
Mr. Indu Prakash i/by Mr. C.K. Tripathi for the petitioner. Ms. A.R. Joshi for the BMC.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATED : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits
that the competent authority will look into the representation filed by the petitioner and they will pass appropriate order in accordance with
law. As the prayer in this writ petition is primarily for disposal of the representation filed by the petitioner, we dispose of the writ petition with the observation that the respondent will abide by their statement
and pass appropriate order within six weeks from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Venkatesh Karkera
Mumbai Municipal Commissioner
Another
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
