Petitioner withdrew his criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution., seeking further remedies as permitted by law. The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal and granted the liberty prayed for.
Liberty to take such other remedy as may be permissible to him in accordance with law was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.985 OF 2008
Dr. Tukaram Appaya Shiware Vs.
.. Petitioner
Government of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Mr. Samir Vaidya for the petitioner. Smt. V.R. Bhosale, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 2ND FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to take such other remedy as may be
permissible to him in accordance with law.
granted.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Dr. Tukaram Appaya Shiware
Government of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
