High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the ULC Act where possession was alleged to have been taken. Court held petitioners had no locus standi as the Act was repealed and possession was already taken.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.122 OF 2009
Gyansegar Mariyadas Gabriel & Ors. .. Petitioners Vs. Govt. of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents
Ms.Smita Gaidhani for the petitioners
Mr.V.P .Malvankar, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3
CORAM : J. N. Patel & Smt. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ
DATE : June 15, 2009
P.C. :
2
( J. N. Patel, J)
(Smt.Mridula Bhatkar, J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners, as alleged tenants, have standing to challenge the acquisition proceedings and possession taken by the government.
Whether notice was required to be given to the petitioners who claimed to be in actual possession.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gyansegar Mariyadas Gabriel
Govt. of Maharashtra
J. N. Patel
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
