The High Court disposed of a writ petition and discharged a show-cause notice, stating that the noticees had framed a policy and agreed to consider representations. No separate reasons were recorded.
Show-cause notice is discharged and the writ petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE NO.5 OF 1998
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.112 OF 1998
Deepak V. Dhuri and others ...Petitioners
v/s
State of Maharashtra and anr. ...Respondents
Mr Bhavesh Parmar for Petitioners.
Mr G.W. Mattos, AGP for Respondent No.1.
Ms S.M. Modale for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH AND R.G. KETKAR JJ.
DATE : 20TH JULY 2009.
2
P.C. :-
1]The noticees have framed policy, they have
also agreed to consider the representations made by
the petitioners. We have disposed off the petition.
In this view of the matter, therefore, show-cause
notice is discharged.
Parties to act on the copy of this order
duly authenticated by the Associate / Private
Secretary of this Court.
Certified copy expedited.
( JUSTICE R.G. KETKAR )
Deepak V. Dhuri
State of Maharashtra
D.K. DESHMUKH
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court