The court held the petition dismissed as infructuous due to demolition of illegal construction. No substantive legal principles were established.
nothing survives in the petition, dismissed as such
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1090 OF 2009
Abdul Rehman Mainuddin .. Petitioner.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents.
Mr. D.H. Mehta i/by A. Sakpal & Co. for the Petitioner. Mrs. V.S. Gharapure for the BMC. Ms. Mugdha Jadhav, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED : 28TH AUGUST, 2009
P.C. :
In view of the fact that the illegal construction has been demolished, the present petition has become infructuous. Hence, nothing survives in the petition, dismissed as such. Disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Abdul Rehman Mainuddin
The State of Maharashtra
The BMC
Swatanter Kumar
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
