Vinod v. Saraiya v Usha G.Saraiya
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit abated due to plaintiff's death.
What the court decided
Ndm
1
ts.55.94.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 55 OF 1994 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 419 OF 1994
Vinod V. Saraiya. ... PLAINTIFF Vs. Usha Girish Saraiya. ... DEFENDANT
Pany Patil i/b Hariani and Company for Plaintiff.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J DATE : 01st September, 2009.
P.C.
1 The learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff makes statement that the Plaintiff is expired long back. Thereafter, there is no instruction at all.
2 This Testamentary Suit, as well as, the Petition, accordingly stand abated and disposed of.
Coram
Anoop V. Mohta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court