The High Court of Bombay disposed of Suit No. 2918 of 2001 as the parties settled the dispute. The interim order was also vacated.
Suit disposed of as settled; interim order vacated; refund of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 2918 OF 2001
Sunita R. Korgaonkar
...Plaintiff.
Vs.
Prashant R. Korgaonkar & Ors.
...Defendants.
Mr. L.H.Patil for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 31st AUGUST, 2009.
P.C.-
1 The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff makes statement that the suit is between the mother and son and they have settled the dispute and therefore, not pressing this suit, in view of settlement. The suit is, therefore, disposed of, as settled out of the Court.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
