None appeared in Testamentary Suit No. 50 of 1992 and Petition No. 140 of 1992. The suits and petition were dismissed in default on their respective dates of absence.
The Suit and the Petition stand dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 50 OF 1992
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.140 OF 1992
Harish H. Bhatia
...Plaintiff.
Vs.
Ramesh H. Bhatia
...Defendant.
None for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendant.
CORAM :- ANOOP V. MOHTA, J. DATED :- 4th August, 2009.
P.C.-
also again none appears.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
