Suit dismissed for want of prosecution due to plaintiff's absence and failure to instruct advocate or pursue proceedings over an extended period.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
SUMMARY SUIT NO.738 OF 1998
Design Shop (India) Ltd.
Vs. Gratex Industries Ltd.
...Plaintiff.
...Defendant.
Mr. Abhishek Sawant i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for the Plaintiffs. Mr. P.K. Kukreja for the Defendant.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
.
P.C.
The Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff has placed on the record two letters respectively dated 29th June 2009 and 2nd July 2009 addressed to the Plaintiff seeking instructions. The Learned Advocate states that the Plaintiff was not traceable on that address. Evidently, the Plaintiff has not taken any steps to pursue the proceedings or to instruct the Advocate. In these circumstances, the Court is constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
