Summary Suit No.591 of 2003, Plaintiff absent, Defendants appeared. Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUMMARY SUIT NO.591 OF 2003
G.E. Capital Services India Ltd. ...Plaintiff. Versus
Sharp Industries Ltd. & Anr.
...Defendants.
None for the Plaintiff.
Mr.N.K. Singh i/b. M.P. Vashi & Asso. for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
September 14, 2009.
P.C.:
The Defendants have entered appearance on 17th March
and their Advocate are absent. The suit is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
