The parties filed Consent Terms, which were recorded and an order was passed in terms of the Consent Terms in a testamentary suit.
Order passed in terms of the Consent Terms filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO.9 OF 2004
IN
PETITION NO.827 OF 2001
Jimmy Dinsha Mobedji and another Vs.
Ms. Meher Rusi Surty and others
..Plaintiffs.
..Defendants.
Mr. N.J. Sethna i/b Wadia Ghandy & Co for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Mahesh Sowmani i/b Vigil Juris for Defendants 1 and 2. Mr. Jimmy Mehta with Mr. H.G. Bhambhani for Defendants 3 and 4.
Mr. K.M. John for Defendant No.5. Mr. R.A.K. Nazam Es. Sani for Defendant No.6. Mr. Tanvir Shaikh for Defendant No.7.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
11th September, 2009.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiffs and for
the Defendants have filed Consent Terms which are taken on record and marked as 'X. The Consent Terms have been signed by the parties and advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties. There shall be an order in terms of the Consent Terms.
Jimmy Dinsha Mobedji
Ms. Meher Rusi Surty
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
