Keith Pereira v. Hetu Ishwarlal Parikh
Case brief
What is this about?
Summary Suit No. 3130 of 1998 was allowed to be withdrawn upon the request of the Plaintiff's Advocate, with court fees refundable as per Rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3130 OF 1998
Keith Pereira ..Plaintiff versus Hetu Ishwarlal Parikh ..Defendant
Mr. Prakash Mahadik for Plaintiff. None for Defendant.
CORAM : DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD , J. DATED : 15TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :
On the request of the Advocate appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff, the suit is allowed to be withdrawn. There shall be a refund of court fees, if
any, as per the Rules.
(DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court