In Suit No.2063 of 1988, the court ordered dismissal for want of prosecution due to failure to file an affidavit of evidence and original documents as per a previous order, with no parties present on a reconstruction hearing.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.
SUIT NO.2063 OF 1988
Canara Bank. ...Plaintiff. Versus M/s.Empee Enterprises & Ors. ...Defendants.
None for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendants.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
July 14, 2009.
P.C.:
Despite the previous order, an affidavit of evidence and a
compilation of the original documents have not been filed. In terms of the previous order, the suit shall stand dismissed for want of
prosecution.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit shall be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-filing of affidavit and documents as ordered previously?
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
