Dismissed
S.M. Thakur v. M.B.Tarkar
Bombay HCSS/2526/1998
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶2
O. O. C. J.
¶3
SUMMARY SUIT NO.2526 OF 1998
¶4
Salauddin Mohamed Thakur ..Plaintiff. Vs.
¶5
M.B. Tarkar ..Defendant.
¶6
Mr. Rajesh C. Shah for the Plaintiff. None for the Defendant.
¶7
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
¶8
24th August, 2009.
¶9
P.C. :
¶10
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff states that no instructions are forthcoming from the Plaintiff for pursuing the suit. Learned counsel applies for discharge. The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff is permitted to be discharged. The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Coram
AI extract
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court