Review petition and notice of motion not pressed by petitioners. High Court dismissed both without engaging in substantive argument.
Review Petition not pressed; dismissed. Notice of Motion dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO. 20 OF 2005 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 191 OF 2005 IN Review Petition (L.) No. 20 of 2005 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2225 OF 2003
Rama Industries Ltd., and another
.. Petitioners.
V/s.
Union of India and others. .. Respondents.
Ms. Deepali Deshmukh i.by Bilawala & Co. for the Petitioners. Mrs. Ashwini Anant Purav i/by M/s. M.P.Vashi & Associates for the Respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2009
P.C. :
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that he does not press the Review Petition. Hence, Review Petition is dismissed as not pressed. In view of dismissal of the Review Petition, nothing survives in the Notice of Motion and the same is also dismissed as such.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD,J.
Rama Industries Ltd., and another
Union of India and others
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
