Summary Suit No. 229 of 1998 between M/s. Navcom Industries Ltd. and M/s. Fortune International Ltd. was heard with the plaintiff's advocate absent on the last date. The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Dismissal of Summary Suit No. 229 of 1998 for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO.229 OF 1998
M/s. Navcom Industries Ltd.
..Plaintiffs
Vs.
M/s. Fortune International Ltd.
..Defendants
None present for the parties
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE: 15th September , 2009
P.C. :
On 25th August 2009 and 8th September 2009, the suit has been adjourned. On the last date of hearing, the Advocate for the Plaintiffs was absent. The Plaintiffs and their Advocates are absent. In these circumstances, the Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the plaintiff on the date of hearing.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
