Dismissed
Ms. Suneeti R. Nathani v. Hindustan Josiery Mills and Anr.
Bombay HCSS/1679/1998
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1679 OF 1998
Suneeti R. Nathani ..Plaintiff Vs. Hindustan Hoseiry Mills & Anr ..Defendants
None present for the parties
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE: 11th AUGUST, 2009
P.C. :
On 30.06.2009, six weeks’ time was granted to take necessary steps. The Advocate who had entered appearance on behalf of the Plaintiffs has been elevated to the Bench, Mr. Y.J.Singh had appeared for the Plaintiffs on the previous occasion. No steps have been taken by the Plaintiffs and the suit has been placed on board under Rule 227 of the High Court (O.S.) Rules for dismissal. The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court