The court dismissed Summary Suit No. 1002 of 1998 for want of prosecution after granting six weeks to the plaintiff, who failed to take any steps towards trial. The suit was placed before Rule 227 of the High Court (O.S.) Rules.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1002 OF 1998
Rajesh R. Nathani ..Plaintiff Vs. Hindustan Hoseiry Mills & Anr ..Defendants
None present for the parties
CORAM: DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATE: 11th AUGUST, 2009
P.C. :
On 30.06.2009, six weeks’ time was granted to take necessary steps. The Advocate who had entered appearance on behalf of the Plaintiffs has been elevated to the Bench, Mr. Y.J.Singh had appeared for the Plaintiffs on the previous occasion. No steps have been taken by the Plaintiffs and the suit has been placed on board under Rule 227 of the High Court (O.S.) Rules for dismissal. The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inaction by the plaintiff.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
