Kalpana Dedhia v. Aslam Saiyed Mohd.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J.…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
SUMMARY SUIT NO.1076 OF 1998
Kalpana Dedhia ..Plaintiff. Vs. Aslam Saiyad Mohd. And another ..Defendants.
None present for the parties.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
18th August, 2009.
P.C. :
On the previous date an adjournment was granted on the request of the Constituted Attorney of the Plaintiff who stated that the advocate was unable to remain present. Three weeks’ time was granted to the Plaintiff to take necessary steps failing which it was observed that the Court would be constrained to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution. It was expressly made clear that no further adjournment would be granted. The Plaintiff and his advocate are absent. No steps have been taken. The suit shall accordingly stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kalpana Dedhia
- respondent
Aslam Saiyad Mohd.
Coram
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court