The Bombay High Court passed an order on an execution application based on a consent minute signed by the parties, recording that decree monies had been paid and directing the execution proceedings be terminated as per the agreed terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.224 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.53 OF 1996
(ON THE FILE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT, SHIMLA)
The Himachal Pradesh State Industrial
..Plaintiff.
Development Corporation Ltd. ..Plaintiff. Vs. M/s. Form Techniks (India) Pvt. Ltd. And others ..Defendants. And H.P. Financial Corporation ..Proforma Defendants.
..Defendants.
Mr. Gaurang Mehta for the Plaintiff/ decree holder. Mr. S.V. Uttam i/b M/s. Pardiwala S. Uttam & Co. for Defendant No.2.
CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
18th August, 2009.
P.C. :
The advocates for the decree holder and Defendant No.2 tender
Minutes of a Consent Order signed by the parties and by the respective advocates. The same are taken on the record in the proceedings of the Execution Application and marked ‘X’ for identification. There shall be an
2
order in the Execution Application in terms of the Minutes of a Consent Order.
The learned counsel desire that the Court should record that the parties are personally present before the Court and that the monies as recorded in the Consent Minutes of Order have already been paid.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
M/s. Form Techniks (India) Pvt. Ltd.
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
