The High Court of Bombay held that a notice of motion did not survive the judgment pronounced the same day, and was disposed of without further consideration.
Notice of motion disposed of as it does not survive the judgment pronounced today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1520 OF 2009
IN APPEAL NO.178 OF 2009 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1541 OF 2007 IN SUIT NO.1327 OF 1997
Mrs.Rukhsana Suleman Chamadia, Of Bombay, adult, Indian Inhabitant, Residing at 10, Kanti Mahal, Telli Galli, ...Appellant Andheri (E), Bombay – 400 069. (Ori.Defendant)
Versus
Mr.Narendra Ramesh Sharma, of Bombay, adult, Indian Inhabitant, Residing at 4, Uday Darshan, 11th Road, ...Respondent Santacruz (E), Bombay – 400 055. (Ori.Plaintiff)
Dr.A.K.Barthakur with Mr.R.Subramanium & Mr.J.A.Udaipuri i/b Ms Mansi Bane for Appellant.
Mr.Shailesh Shah with Mr.Sanjay Jain & Ms.Sapna Rachure i/b T.N.Tripathi & Co. for Respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. AND A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
DATED : 17TH SEPTEMBER 2009.
: 2 :
P.C.
In view of the Judgment pronounced today, this notice of motion does not survive for consideration. Hence, disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Mrs. Rukhsana Suleman Chamadia
Mr. Narendra Ramesh Sharma
Swatanter Kumar
A.M.Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
