Dismissed
Laxman Gambhir Kamble v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/87/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.87 OF 2008
Shri Laxman Gambhir Kamble ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others. ... Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. N.J. Patil for the respondent Nos.7 and 28. Ms. S. Sonawane for the respondent No.6. Mr. P.M. Patil, Assistant Government Pleader for the State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.
&
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 2ND APRIL, 2009 P.C.:
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. Dismissed
in default.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Shri Laxman Gambhir Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
Svatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court