Court disposed of the Writ Petition after the respondent agreed to examine grievances raised, marking the matter stayed by their own operation of law.
The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The Respondents abide by their statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION PIL NO. 234 OF 2009
Bhoomata Kisan Manch, Satara. .. Petitioner Vs District Collector, Satara & Ors. .. Respondents
Shri Ajit Kenjale for the Petitioner. Shri R.P. Behere, Addl.GP for Respondents.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.M. KHANWILKAR, J DATED : 12TH NOVEMBER, 2009
P.C.
Learned Additional Govt. Pleader appearing for the
Respondents submits that the State would direct the Registrar, Co operative Societies to examine the grievances raised in the present Writ Petition. In the event the Registrar, Cooperative Societies finds substance in the grievances, he shall proceed in accordance with law. 2. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in this Petition. The Petition is accordingly disposed of with no order as to
costs. The Respondents will abide by their statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J
Bhoomata Kisan Manch, Satara
District Collector, Satara
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
