Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal Alias Chander Kumar Kishan Gehi v. Union of India and 10 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 79 OF 2009
Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal ).. Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ).. Respondents
Mr. Chandrashekhar Patil i/b.Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal for the Petitioner.
Mr. D.J. Khambatta, Additional Solicitor General, a/w. Mr.A.M Sethna for the Union of India.
Mr. M.D. Siodia a/w Mr. Harshal Manik a/w Mr.Raina Bhagatwala i/b Rustomji & Ginwala for Respondent Nos.7 to 9.
Mr. Parag Kabadi i/b Doijode & Associates for Respondent No.10.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 19TH NOVEMBER 2009
P.C .
The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.8 has placed on record the copy of the letter dated 12th November 2009 wherein it has been stated that the tender has been refloated on 3rd November 2009 after revising the Eligibility Criteria. The said letter taken on record. In view of this, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition and the same is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.
Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal
Union of India
Sudhanshu Shekhar Verma
A.M. Khanwilkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court