This court dismissed the motion to extend the time for hearing a writ petition because no grounds were made out to condone delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.376 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 880 OF 2008
M/s.Deepal Agencies Pvt.Ltd.
and Ors. ...Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Anrs. ...Respondents
....
Mr.Sandeep V.Wasnik Adv. for Mr.Suraj
M.Shah Advocate for Petitioners
Mr.D.A.Nalawade, G.P. for Respondent Nos.1,3 and 4
CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 24, 2009
P.C.
1. Heard.
2. No case is made out to condone the delay and
extend the time. Hence, Motion stands dismissed.
[J.N.PATEL, J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
M/s.Deepal Agencies Pvt.Ltd. and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anrs.
J.N.PATEL
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court