Allowed
M/S. Raptakos Brett Test Laboratories Ltd. v. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr.
Bombay HCNMW/295/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 295 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1529 OF 1994
Raptakos Brett Test
Laboratories Ltd., .. Petitioners.
vs.
The Commissioner of Provident
Fund & Anr. .. Respondents.
Mr. R.D. Oak for Petitioners.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE: 10TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.
. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of the notice of motion, the motion is allowed
in terms of prayer clause (a).
(J.N. Patel, J.)
2
(Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.)
Raptakos Brett Test Laboratories Ltd.
The Commissioner of Provident Fund
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court