Disposed
Uttam Kisan Bhagat and 5 Ors. v. Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corpn. and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/22/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.{1}.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.22 OF 2009
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.19 OF 2008
Uttam Kisan Bhagat
and 5 others. ..Petitioners.
Versus
Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation
and 2 others. ..Respondents.
Mr.Sugandh B. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioners.
Mr.S.S.Pakale, Advocate with Ms.Shobha Ajeet Kumar,
Advocate for respondent - B.M.C..
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : 9TH FEBRUARY, 2009.
P.C.:-
1. The learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioners does not want to press the Notice of
Motion, but, submits that as this decision taken by
the Corporation is of the year, 1982 and is not
implemented yet, the Petition requires to be heard
expeditiously. The learned Counsel appearing for the
respondent has no objection. We, therefore, permit
the Notice of Motion to be withdrawn. Notice of
Motion is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Hearing expedited.
[J.N.PATEL,J.]
.{2}.
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Uttam Kisan Bhagat
Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation
J.N. PATEL
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court